UNC Charlotte
Text Only Calendars Search 49er Express
 
Current Students Future Students Faculty & Staff Family & Visitors Alumni & Friends

TENURE POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES OF

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE

Revised effective April 20, 2007

1.3 Day
3.2.3 Professor

7 Process for Review of Unfavorable RPT Decisions

7.2.2.3 Election

9.3 Assistance for Faculty Members and Rights to New Positions

10.2.1 Date

1           Definitions

1.1            Academic Year

“Academic Year” and its beginning and end means the academic year as shown on the official University academic calendar published by the Office of Academic Affairs.

1.2          College and Dean

For purposes of this document, the term "College" shall include the Library and the term "Dean" shall include the University Librarian.

1.3          Day

The word "Day" whenever it is used in Sections 6, 7, 8, and 9, shall mean any day except Saturday, Sunday, or an institutional holiday except when calendar day is specified. In computing any period of time, the Day in which notice is received is not counted but the last Day of the period being computed is to be counted.

1.4          Faculty

For purposes of this document, the term "Faculty" means all persons who hold Professorial Rank pursuant to Section 3.2 below, or a Special Faculty Appointment pursuant to Section 3.4 below.

1.5          Faculty Member

For purposes of this document, the term "Faculty Member" means any person who is a member of the Faculty as that term is defined in Section 1.4 above.

1.6          Financial Exigency

For purposes of this document, the term “Financial Exigency” is defined as a significant decline in the financial resources of the University that is brought about by decline in institutional enrollment or by other action or events that compel a reduction in the University’s current operations budget.

1.7          Formal Notice

For the purposes of this document, giving “Formal Notice” means notifying or attempting to notify an individual of an action or decision following the notice standards set forth in The University of North Carolina Board of Governors Policy 101.3.3.

1.8          Impermissible Grounds

For the purposes of this document, basing a decision on “Impermissible Grounds” means basing a decision on (1) exercise by the Faculty Member of rights of freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or by Article I of the Constitution of North Carolina; (2) discrimination based upon the race, color, creed, sex, disability, sexual orientation, religion, age, or national origin of the Faculty Member or because of the person’s honorable service in the armed services of the United States; or (3) Personal Malice.

1.9          Instructor

For purposes of this document, the term “Instructor” is an individual who begins employment at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in a fixed-term appointment bearing that title before having been awarded the appropriate terminal degree or who presents evidence of comparable professional distinction in his or her field.

1.10          Mandatory Review

For purposes of this document, the term “Mandatory Review” means a review that is required to be made in a specified year of a Faculty Member's career pursuant to this document.

1.11          Material Procedural Irregularities

For purposes of this document, “Material Procedural Irregularities” means departures from prescribed procedures governing reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure that cast reasonable doubt upon the validity of the decision not to reappoint, not to promote, or not to confer Permanent Tenure.

1.12          Personal Malice

A decision not to reappoint, not to promote, or not to confer Permanent Tenure on a Faculty Member is based on "Personal Malice" if the decision maker permits that decision to be made because of dislike, animosity, ill-will, or hatred based on the Faculty Member's personal characteristics, traits, or circumstances not relevant to valid University decision making.

1.13          Professorial Rank

For purposes of this document, the term “Professorial Rank” is the rank of Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, or Professor.

1.14          Tenure; Permanent Tenure

For purposes of this document, the term “Tenure” refers to the duration of a Faculty appointment.   “Permanent Tenure” is an employment status awarded by the Board of Trustees of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (formerly by the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina), and is a recognition of an individual’s academic achievements.  To attain the award of Permanent Tenure, an individual must demonstrate teaching, research, and service accomplishments meeting criteria established by the University. An appointment with Permanent Tenure creates an expectation of continued employment for an indefinite period of time, unless the Faculty Member is removed from such employment by the University for any of the reasons, and only in accordance with the procedures, established in Section 8 of this document. Only those individuals holding the rank of Associate Professor or Professor are eligible for the award of Permanent Tenure.

Faculty appointments with Permanent Tenure may be contrasted with all other Faculty appointments, which entitle the Faculty Member to employment only for the fixed term of service set forth in the document of appointment.

Although Faculty appointments with Permanent Tenure and fixed-term Faculty appointments differ in duration, both carry important rights as a matter of UNC Charlotte and University of North Carolina policy.  These rights include academic freedom and freedom of inquiry, and the right to protection against the unjust or arbitrary application of disciplinary penalties, as described in Section 2.

1.15          Tenure Track

A Faculty Member is “on the Tenure Track” if he or she holds a fixed-term appointment at a Professorial Rank and must be reviewed for the conferral of Permanent Tenure not later than the end of a specified term of service.

1.16          Unfavorable RPT Decision

For purposes of this document, the term “Unfavorable RPT Decision” means a decision not to reappoint, not to promote, or not to confer Permanent Tenure on a Faculty Member.

2 Academic Freedom and Responsibility of Faculty

The University of North Carolina at Charlotte endorses and supports the principles of academic freedom and responsibility of Faculty, as set forth in Sections 601 and 602 of The Code of the University of North Carolina.  UNC Charlotte will support and encourage full freedom, within the law, of inquiry, discourse, teaching, research, and publication for all members of its Faculty, to the end that they may responsibly pursue the transmission and advancement of knowledge and understanding free from internal or external restraints that would unreasonably restrict academic endeavors.  The University will protect Faculty Members in the responsible exercise of the freedom to teach, to learn, and otherwise to seek and speak the truth, and will not penalize or discipline members because of the exercise of academic freedom in the lawful pursuit of their respective areas of scholarly and professional interest and responsibility. 

Faculty Members will share in the responsibility for maintaining an environment in which academic freedom flourishes and in which the rights of each member of the academic community are respected.  They are expected to recognize that accuracy, forthrightness and dignity befit their association with the University, and should not represent themselves, without authorization, as spokespersons for the University of North Carolina or any of its constituent institutions.

3           Faculty Appointments

3.1     General Considerations in Faculty Appointments

Recommendations, determinations, and decisions on initial appointment, reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure shall be based upon an assessment of at least the following: (1) the Faculty Member's demonstrated professional competence; (2) potential for future contribution to The University of North Carolina at Charlotte; and (3) institutional needs and resources.

3.2     Professorial Ranks and Their Characteristics

To be qualified for Professorial Rank (Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor), a person shall hold the appropriate terminal degree or present evidence of comparable professional distinction in his or her field.

Prior professional experience shall be taken into account in determining initial rank and salary.

Appointment in a given department or unit shall not continue beyond seven years of experience in the Professorial Ranks at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte unless a decision to award Permanent Tenure has been made during or before year six. However, in rare cases, an individual who has not been granted Permanent Tenure may subsequently be offered a Special Faculty Appointment in accordance with Section 3.4.

Notice of reappointment or nonreappointment shall be in writing from the Provost and shall be given not later than the end of the penultimate year of the current appointment. If the decision is not to reappoint, failure to provide written notice shall oblige the Chancellor thereafter to offer a terminal appointment of one academic year beyond the termination of the current appointment.

A Faculty Member may be considered for the conferral of Permanent Tenure or promotion with conferral of Permanent Tenure at times earlier than those specified in this Section 3.

3.2.1          Assistant Professor

The initial appointment of a Faculty Member at the rank of Assistant Professor shall be for a term of four years.

Before the end of the third year of the initial appointment as Assistant Professor, the Faculty Member shall be reviewed for reappointment and shall receive written notice of reappointment at the same or higher rank or of nonreappointment.

An Assistant Professor who is reappointed at the same rank shall receive an appointment of three years. During and before the end of the second year of the second appointment as Assistant Professor, he or she shall be reviewed and given written notice of promotion to Associate Professor with conferral of Permanent Tenure or of nonreappointment. Permanent Tenure may not be awarded to a Faculty Member at the rank of Assistant Professor.

3.2.2          Associate Professor

With the written approval of the dean of the College and the concurrence of the Provost obtained in advance of the initiation of formal appointment procedures, an initial appointment to the rank of Associate Professor with Permanent Tenure may be recommended, to become effective upon the subsequent approval of the appointment through the procedures of Section 4.

When a Faculty Member's initial appointment by the institution is to the rank of Associate Professor without Permanent Tenure, the appointment is to a term of three to five years. During and before the end of the penultimate year of the appointment as Associate Professor, the Faculty Member shall be reviewed for Permanent Tenure and given written notice from the Provost that he or she will be reappointed with Permanent Tenure at the same or higher rank or of nonreappointment.

A Faculty Member promoted to the rank of Associate Professor must also be awarded Permanent Tenure.

An Associate Professor with Permanent Tenure is required to undergo a comprehensive review every five years pursuant to the “Tenured Faculty Performance Review Policy.” If a review of a tenured Faculty Member for promotion to full professor is conducted at the time at which a Tenured Faculty Performance Review is mandated, review for promotion fulfills the requirement. An Associate Professor with Permanent Tenure may not elect to postpone periodic reviews as required under the “Tenured Faculty Performance Review Policy.”

3.2.3          Professor

The initial appointment of a Faculty Member to the rank of Professor shall be either with Permanent Tenure or for a term of three to five years.   If the initial appointment is without Permanent Tenure, the Faculty Member shall be reviewed for reappointment with Permanent Tenure and given written notice from the Provost, during and before the end of the penultimate year of the appointment, of reappointment with Permanent Tenure or of nonreappointment. 

A Faculty Member who is promoted to the rank of Professor shall have Permanent Tenure.

All Professors will be subject periodic reviews as required under the “Tenured Faculty Performance Review Policy.”

3.3     Annual Performance Review for Tenure Track Faculty

The chair will provide each tenure track Faculty Member in the department’s Professorial Ranks a letter each year that provides an evaluation of the Faculty Member’s accomplishments during the previous year and that discusses the Faculty Member’s progress toward achieving reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure, as appropriate. The letter should clearly and specifically address strengths and weaknesses in the performance of the Faculty Member, providing for a clear plan and timetable for improvement of any deficiencies in performance.  While ultimate decisions on reappointment, promotion, and the conferral of Permanent Tenure take into account many factors, not all of which are related to the Faculty Member’s performance, effective annual evaluations are intended to help to eliminate unexpected results in the comprehensive reviews supporting decisions on reappointment, promotion, and the conferral of Permanent Tenure. Guidelines for the annual performance review are detailed in the UNC Charlotte Academic Personnel Procedures Handbook.

3.4     Special Faculty Appointments

If a Faculty appointment is not an appointment to the Professorial Ranks, it is a Special Faculty Appointment.  A Special Faculty Appointment shall carry a title appropriate to the responsibilities of the position, such as Visiting Professor, Adjunct Professor, Instructor, Assistant Professor (Library), Assistant Professor (Military), Lecturer, Assistant Research Professor (see Policy Statement #100, Research Appointments), or Artist-in-Residence.  All Special Faculty Appointments are for a specified term of service.  The letter of appointment shall specify the length of the term of service.
The specification of the length of the appointment shall be deemed to constitute full and timely notice of nonreappointment when that term expires. Except as provided in Section 3.4.2, the University has no obligation to consider future appointments for persons with such Special Faculty Appointments. The “Principles of Employment for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty” shall be considered in the development of policies and procedures related to persons holding Special Faculty Appointments.
Faculty Members in Special Faculty Appointments shall not be eligible for Permanent Tenure.

3.4.1          Instructor

To be qualified for the rank of Instructor, a person shall be a candidate for the appropriate terminal degree or present evidence of comparable professional distinction in his or her field. An Instructor shall be appointed for a term of one year. Ordinarily, service as an Instructor should not exceed one year, and in no case shall an Instructor serve in this rank for more than two years. It is expected that an Instructor will complete the work necessary to be qualified for the rank of Assistant Professor in two years or less. An Instructor who completes the requirements for the rank of Assistant Professor will be eligible to be considered for appointment to an initial four-year term as Assistant Professor at the beginning of the next academic year. Service as an Instructor shall not be included when computing the maximum seven-year period noted in Section 3.2 above.

3.4.2          Library Faculty Members in Certain Special Faculty Appointments

Library Faculty Members covered by the “Procedures for Initial Appointment, Reappointment, and Promotion for Covered Library Faculty at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte” (“Covered Library Faculty”) hold Special Faculty Appointments. Covered Library Faculty shall be considered for appointment, reappointment, promotion, and annual review as provided in those Procedures.  Covered Library Faculty Members may seek review of a decision not to reappoint or not to promote in accord with Section 7 below. 

3.5     Joint Appointments

A Faculty Member, either in a Professorial Rank or in a Special Faculty Appointment, may at one time hold only one full-time appointment at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. This appointment may be held, by joint appointment, between or among two or more departments, between or among a department and one or more programs or centers, or by holding an appointment to an administrative position concurrently with a Faculty appointment. In all joint appointments, the base unit of appointment shall be an academic unit.

A Faculty Member with Permanent Tenure who accepts an administrative position within The University of North Carolina at Charlotte shall retain Permanent Tenure, and shall be judged for promotion according to the same criteria and on the same schedule as apply to other Permanently Tenured Faculty Members in the Faculty Member's base unit. A Faculty Member without Permanent Tenure who holds an administrative position shall be considered for reappointment, promotion, and conferral of Permanent Tenure according to the same criteria, and on the same schedule, as apply to Faculty Members of the same rank and Tenure status in the Faculty Member's base unit.  Procedures for renewal of the joint administrative appointment shall be specified in the original appointment recommendation.

When a joint appointment is to be made as part of an initial appointment to the Faculty, the regular procedures prescribed herein for initial appointment to the rank proposed shall be followed simultaneously by the units involved in making a joint recommendation for appointment. The joint recommendation shall designate one of the units as the unit of base appointment and set forth, at a minimum, the terms and conditions specified in the "Policy Statement on Joint Appointments for Faculty" included in the UNC Charlotte Academic Personnel Procedures Handbook. If the joint appointment is approved by the Provost, thereafter the base unit is responsible for processing personnel actions that affect the joint appointee; but with respect to each such action, the recommendation put forward shall be one jointly concurred in by the units concerned as required by their agreed procedures for joint consultation and decision. An agreement signed by the Faculty Member, the Provost, and the heads of the affected units will describe the process for evaluating the Faculty Member holding such joint appointment. The Faculty Member shall be judged for promotion according to the same criteria and on the same schedule as apply to Faculty Members in the Faculty Member's base unit.

When a joint appointment is made for a person who is already a member of the Faculty, the heads of the affected units shall jointly put forward through the regular channels for review of initial appointments a recommendation that the existing appointment be converted into a joint appointment. The joint recommendation shall include the same elements required with respect to a recommendation for initial joint appointment. Upon approval of such a recommendation, the joint appointee retains the same Faculty rank and Tenure status as previously held, and shall enjoy the rights associated with the Faculty position. Thereafter, all personnel actions affecting his or her Faculty appointment shall be processed as provided in the case of an initial joint appointment.

The provisions of this section do not apply to the creation of adjunct appointments for persons who are currently members of the Faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

3.6     Continued Availability of Special Funding

The appointment, reappointment, or promotion of a Faculty Member to a position funded in whole or in substantial part from sources other than continuing State budget funds or permanent trust funds shall specify in writing that the continuance of his or her services, whether for a specified term or for Permanent Tenure, shall be contingent upon the continuing availability of such funds. This contingency shall not be included in a Faculty Member's appointment following promotion if, before the effective date of that promotion, the Faculty Member had Permanent Tenure and no such contingency was attached to the conferral of Permanent Tenure.

If a Faculty Member's appointment is terminated because these funds are not available, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte shall make every reasonable effort to give the same notice as set forth in Section 3.2. Furthermore, the University shall make every reasonable effort to give at least twelve months notice to Faculty Members with Permanent Tenure.

3.7     Leaves of Absence

A Faculty Member may receive full or partial Leave of Absence providing relief from full-time employment responsibilities for a fixed period, upon recommendation of the department chair and dean, and by written agreement signed by the Provost or designee and Faculty Member. The agreement shall specify the effect of the leave on the timetable for consideration of Tenure. (See The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Policy Statement #46, "Leaves of Absence for Members of the Faculty.") 

Any provisions for less than full-time employment in an initial appointment to the Faculty must be specified in the initial appointment document signed by the appropriate University official.  

3.8     Faculty Resignations and Retirements

A Faculty Member who decides to resign or to retire from The University of North Carolina at Charlotte has the obligation to give timely written notice of the decision, with its effective date, to his or her immediate supervisor.

4           Procedures for Initial Appointment

4.1     Procedures for Initial Appointment

Each College shall establish procedures for the initial appointment of all Faculty Members, including how search committees are formed and how they operate to provide recommendations to the dean concerning the appointment of full-time Faculty.  Such procedures shall be consistent with the UNC Charlotte Academic Personnel Procedures Handbook, this document, and, for Special Faculty Appointments, procedures developed by the applicable College that are consistent with the “Principles of Employment for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty.” 

College procedures shall provide that the department chair shall consider the recommendation of the Department Review Committee (DRC; see Section 5.3 below) before forwarding to the dean any recommendation that will confer Permanent Tenure in an initial appointment. The department chair shall forward to the dean the recommendation and rationale of the DRC along with his or her recommendation and rationale. College procedures may also provide additional requirements for review and consultation in the initial appointment process.

For Assistant Professor and Special Faculty Appointments, the dean of the College, after consulting with the department chair, shall forward his or her decision to appoint along with the necessary documentation to the Provost.  The dean shall forward to the Provost a recommendation to appoint any Associate Professor or Professor, or any recommendation for an appointment that will carry Permanent Tenure.

The Provost shall have final authority to make decisions to appoint Associate Professors and Professors without Permanent Tenure. For an appointment that would confer Permanent Tenure, the Provost shall make a recommendation to the Chancellor.

If the Chancellor decides not to recommend an appointment that would confer Permanent Tenure, that decision is final. If the Chancellor concurs with a recommendation from the Provost to make an appointment that would confer Permanent Tenure, the Chancellor shall forward his or her recommendation to the Board of Trustees for final approval. 

4.2     Closed Sessions

Any deliberations by a search committee concerning appointment for a particular Faculty Member shall be held in closed session, with only those present whom the committee deems necessary to its deliberations.

4.3     Confidentiality

All documents submitted or created in connection with the process of review for initial appointment and the information contained therein, as well as information derived from any discussions that are part of the formal review, are considered confidential personnel information. All persons participating in the process of review for initial appointment shall treat such information as confidential. Such confidential records and information shall not be disclosed to or discussed with any person except: (1) search committee members (2) those persons required or permitted to be consulted in accord with the requirements of department, College, or University policies; or (3) those persons permitted access to such documents by law. Violation of this section may expose any Faculty Member, including an administrator, to the imposition of serious sanctions pursuant to Section 8 below.

4.4     Terms and Conditions of Appointment

The general terms and conditions and any specific terms and conditions of each initial appointment and of each reappointment to the Faculty shall either be set forth in the document of appointment or reappointment or shall be incorporated therein by clear reference to specified documents that shall be readily available to the Faculty Member. A copy of the terms, signed by the Chancellor or a delegated officer, shall be delivered to and signed by the Faculty Member.

5           Review Committees for Faculty Members in Professorial Ranks

5.1     Closed Sessions

Any deliberations by a department or College review committee concerning reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure for a particular Faculty Member shall be held in closed session, with only those present whom the committee deems necessary to its deliberations.

5.2     Confidentiality

All documents submitted or created in connection with the process of review for reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure, and the information contained therein, as well as information derived from any discussions that are part of the formal review, are considered confidential personnel information. All persons participating in the process of review for initial appointment, reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure shall treat such information as confidential. Such confidential records and information shall not be disclosed to or discussed with any person except: (1) review committee members; (2) those persons required or permitted to be consulted in accord with the requirements of department, College, or University policies; or (4) those persons permitted access to such documents by law. Violation of this section may expose any Faculty Member, including an administrator, to the imposition of serious sanctions pursuant to Section 8 below.

5.3     Department Review Committee (DRC) on Reappointment, Promotion, and the Conferral of Permanent Tenure

In Colleges with formal departmental structure, each department shall have a Department Review Committee (DRC) that provides the department chair with recommendations on reappointment, promotion, and the conferral of Permanent Tenure. The DRC shall be elected by the department Faculty from the department Faculty who have full-time appointments holding Professorial Rank. Election shall be according to procedures established by the department Faculty. At least three Permanently Tenured Faculty Members shall serve as the voting members of the committee, and the Permanently Tenured members shall have a majority. Permanently Tenured Faculty Members from other departments may be selected, according to a procedure approved by the department Faculty, as voting members only if necessary to constitute the committee. Faculty Members without Permanent Tenure who hold Professorial Rank may serve only as nonvoting participants, as determined by the department. The committee shall elect its chair from its Permanently Tenured members.

No dean, department chair, associate dean, or assistant dean may serve on the DRC.

A department may permit, pursuant to its own policies, Tenure Track Faculty Members who are not members of the DRC to observe the DRC as it conducts its deliberations; provided that the chair of the DRC informs such observers that they are bound by the confidentiality requirements set forth in Section 5.2

In Colleges without formal departmental structure or in Colleges with Schools, the Faculty will create procedures for review for reappointment, promotion, and the conferral of Permanent Tenure for Tenure Track Faculty that provide the opportunity for two separate and independent reviews within the College. A document that describes these procedures will be reviewed by the College Faculty and approved by the Provost.

5.4     College Review Committee (CRC) on Reappointment, Promotion, and the Conferral of Permanent Tenure

Each College shall have a College Review Committee (CRC) that provides the dean with  recommendations on reappointment, promotion, and the conferral of Permanent Tenure. The committee shall be elected by the College Faculty from the Permanently Tenured Faculty of the College who hold full-time appointments. Election shall be according to procedures established by the College Faculty that provides for the election of at least three members. The CRC shall elect its chair from its members.

Colleges shall have procedures ensuring that no Faculty Member participates in the same case as a member of both the DRC and the CRC in reviewing or providing recommendations about reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure.

No dean, department chair, associate dean, or assistant dean may serve on the CRC.

It is the responsibility of members of the CRC to act in the interest of the College in general. Members of the CRC do not serve on that body to represent the interests of their home departments in supporting or opposing the case of any Faculty Member under consideration by the CRC.

6           Procedures for Review for Reappointment, Promotion, and the Conferral of Permanent Tenure for Faculty Members in Professorial Ranks

6.1     Notifications

Each positive or negative determination and the rationale for such determination on reappointment, promotion, or conferral of Permanent Tenure made by a chair or a dean shall be provided in writing to the Faculty Member to whom it pertains simultaneously with its transmittal to the next administrative level. Each positive or negative decision of the Provost or the Chancellor and the rationale for any negative decision on reappointment, promotion, or conferral of Permanent Tenure shall be provided in writing to the Faculty Member to whom it pertains simultaneously with its transmittal to the next administrative level. That Faculty Member shall have access to all documents that are part of the decision-making process.

6.2     Permissible and Impermissible Grounds for Decisions

Except as herein provided, determinations and decisions pertaining to reappointment, promotion, and conferral of Permanent Tenure are, without further recourse, the responsibility of the officers of administration authorized to make them, acting in accordance with procedures prescribed herein. In exercise of their judgment, whether in the first instance or in review of recommendations, such officers may take into account and use as the basis of decision, in whole or in part, any factors deemed relevant to total institutional interests, except that in no event shall an Unfavorable RPT Decision be based upon Impermissible Grounds or Material Procedural Irregularities as defined in Section 1 of this document.

6.3     Channels of Review

6.3.1          Faculty Member’s Right to Terminate Review

A Faculty Member may terminate a review for reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure at any time prior to notification of the Provost’s final decision under Section 6.3.4 below by delivering a signed written request for termination of review to the department chair, with copies to the dean and Provost. The department chair, dean, or Provost shall respond in writing to the request.  If the request is granted, the termination of the review is irrevocable. 

If the review terminated by the Faculty Member included the question of reappointment, employment in the Professorial Rank will not extend beyond the end of the current term of employment.  

If the review terminated by the Faculty Member included the question of promotion or of the conferral of Permanent Tenure when such review is not mandated by Section 3.2, then the review shall be terminated.  The termination of a review under these circumstances shall have no effect on voluntary or Mandatory Reviews in subsequent academic years.

6.3.2          Departmental Review

In all review cases, the deadline for submission of full dossiers may not be earlier than the first day of the academic year during which the review will take place. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, departments may set earlier deadlines with regard to the submission of any materials or information needed to obtain external review letters.

The Permanently Tenured Faculty Members in the department, other than those who will participate in the review process at another level, who are at or above the rank for which a candidate is under consideration shall be provided an opportunity to review the candidate's dossier and provide advice to the DRC. Evaluations of the candidate’s dossier by the DRC and by the chair are intended to be separate and independent. However, the DRC may invite the department chair into its discussions if the DRC unanimously determines that doing so will assist in its deliberations. The DRC shall submit its recommendation(s) and rationale(s) whether or not to reappoint, to promote, or to confer Permanent Tenure to the department chair after considering the advice provided by such Permanently Tenured Faculty. If the department chair’s determination is positive on each action under review, he or she shall, after consulting with the assembled DRC, submit his or her determination and rationale, together with the recommendation(s) and rationale(s) of the DRC, to the dean of the College.

If, after consulting with the assembled DRC, the department chair determines not to reappoint, promote, or confer Permanent Tenure for a Faculty Member under review, he or she shall meet with the Faculty Member to provide the Faculty Member with a copy of that determination and its rationale, and to explain the Faculty Member’s right of rebuttal. Within ten Days after this meeting, the Faculty Member may submit to the dean and the chair his or her written rebuttal to the chair’s determination. Upon receipt of the Faculty Member’s rebuttal, or at the end of ten Days after the chair meets with the Faculty Member if the Faculty Member does not submit a rebuttal, the chair shall submit his or her determinations and rationales, together with the recommendations and rationales of the DRC, to the dean of the College. 

6.3.3          College Review

After receipt of the determinations and rationales of the department chair and the recommendations and rationales of the DRC, and the Faculty Member’s rebuttal to the chair’s determination, if any, the dean shall deliver such documents to the CRC. The CRC shall submit its recommendations and rationales to the dean. If the dean’s determination is positive on each action under review for a Faculty Member, he or she shall, after consulting with the assembled CRC, submit his or her determinations and rationales, together with the recommendations and rationales of the CRC and the DRC, the determinations and rationales of the department chair, and the Faculty Member’s rebuttal(s), if any, to the Provost.

If, after consulting with the assembled CRC, the dean determines not to reappoint, promote, or confer Permanent Tenure for a Faculty Member under review, he or she shall meet with the Faculty Member to provide the Faculty Member with a copy of that determination and its rationale, and to explain the Faculty Member’s right of rebuttal. Within ten Days after this meeting, the Faculty Member may submit to the Provost and the dean his or her written rebuttal to the dean’s determination. Upon receipt of the Faculty Member’s rebuttal, or at the end of ten Days after the dean meets with the Faculty Member if the Faculty Member does not submit a rebuttal, the dean shall submit his or her determinations and rationales, together with the recommendations and rationales of the CRC and the DRC, the determinations and rationales of the department chair, and the Faculty Member’s rebuttal(s), if any, to the Provost.

6.3.4          Provost’s Review

In each case regarding reappointment, promotion, or the conferral of Permanent Tenure, the Provost shall consider the recommendations and rationales from the DRC and the CRC, determinations and rationales from the chair and the dean, and the Faculty Member’s rebuttal(s), if any, before making his or her decision or recommendation.

If the Provost decides not to reappoint, promote, or confer Permanent Tenure on a Faculty Member, he or she shall, by written statement, notify the Faculty Member under consideration of that decision and its rationale. Such notice, when concerning reappointment, or when concerning conferral of Permanent Tenure in connection with a Mandatory Review for reappointment, constitutes full and timely notice of nonreappointment as required in Section 3.2.

If the Provost makes a positive recommendation to confer Permanent Tenure, he or she shall submit such recommendation to the Chancellor together with the recommendations and rationales from the DRC and the CRC, determinations and rationales from the chair and the dean, and the Faculty Member’s rebuttal(s), if any.

All decisions of the Provost regarding reappointment and promotion, as well as negative decisions regarding the conferral of Permanent Tenure, are final and cannot be appealed on the merits. A Faculty Member who contends that the decision was based on Impermissible Grounds or Material Procedural Irregularities at any point in the review process may seek a hearing on that contention in accordance with the procedures in Section 7.

6.3.5          Chancellor’s Review

The Chancellor shall consider recommendations from the Provost to confer Permanent Tenure. If the Chancellor concurs in a recommendation from the Provost to confer Permanent Tenure, the