POLS 1130 / Walker
Introduction to Comparative Politics
Unit Examination 2: Study Guide
General Information
-
This exam will be closed book and notes. It will organized in much the
same way as the first unit exam, including both short answer questions
and an essay question.
-
You must submit a blank blue book (available
at the bookstore) during the review session in order to take the exam.
Please put your name on the book in
pencil before handing it in.
-
Articles assigned out of the Economist and
the discussion of current events in class are fair game short answer questions.
The information provided below is intended as an aid to studying for the
final. Another aid is the list of key terms and critical thinking exercises
found at the end of each chapter of the Hauss text. Please note that
this list should not be treated as exhaustive. You are responsible for
all course material, whether or not it appears in this guide.
Key Terms and Concepts.. The following are the sorts of terms
and concepts you are expected to be familiar with:
back-bencher (GB)
Bundesrat (GER)
Bundestag (GER)
cabinet
catch-all party
collective responsibility (GB)
constitution
corporatism
Diet (JPN)
Duma (RUS)
Duverger's Law
electoral systems: SMDP/MMDP/PR/additional member
governments: presidential/parliamentary
head of state/government
interest group
interest group pluralism
intra party factions (JPN)
iron triangle |
judicial review
koenkai (JPN)
legislature: bicameral, unicameral
materialist/post-materialist values
median voter theorem
nested political relationships
no-confidence vote
parliamentary sovereignty (GB)
parliamentary coalition
party systems: one, two, multiple
party discipline
political institution
public policy
realignment
separation of powers (US)
shadow cabinet (GB)
social movement
taxation: progressive, regressive, flat |
Comparative Issues
You should be familiar enough with the political institutions (constitution,
party system, electoral system, structure and powers of the various branches
of government, extent of federalism) to be able to make comparisons between
our six case study polities. You should also be familiar the major
parties (see Table 3.3 in Hauss).
Essay Questions
One of the following questions will appear on the examination.
-
It is often asserted that a pattern exists in the relationship between
the number of parties in a particular polity and the type of electoral
system it uses. What is the pattern? What is the underlying theoretical
explanation? How might we account for countries that do not follow the
pattern exactly, such as Great Britain or Nigeria?
-
"Political parties are firmly rooted in political culture." Comment on
the assertion and provide evidence from our case countries and your own
research.
-
Sven Steinmo's comparative analysis of taxation in the United States, Great
Britain, and Sweden argues that public policies are nested within political
institutions. Demonstrate this using examples from at least two of
the three cases Steinmo uses.
-
The aging, authoritarian leader of the African republic of Equitoria has
decided he wants to introduce real democracy before he dies. He has
proposed restoring the 1960 constitution left behind by the French colonial
administrators that calls for a unicameral legislature with representatives
elected by proportional representation. Before going public with
his plan, the president has asked you for your comments. He is very
concerned that Equitoria's political institutions both reflect and bring
stability to the polity's diverse political culture. Equitoria has
three major ethnic groups, each with about 25 percent of the population,
plus two others of about 12 percent. The population is also about
evenly divided between Christians and Muslims. Conflicts between
the various groups has not been uncommon, especially recently, and the
military has threatened to step in if greater democracy brings either political
paralysis or civil conflict. Write a memo to the president that comments
on his proposals with respect to the constitution and the electoral system.