June 1, 2006

 

 

Memo for:   Business Continuity Plan Management Committee

 

 

Subject:  Minutes of the May 31, 2006 Meeting

 

 

A meeting of the Business Continuity Plan Management Committee was held on Friday, May 31, 2006, in Room 208 Cone Center.

 

1.      Attendance:

a.       Present:  Ray Galleno, Diana Gann, Laura Goodburn, Lee Gray, Carter Heath, Tony Hoppa, Michelle Howard, Monica Hudson, John Jacobs, Phil Jones, Debra Joyce, Jeanne Madorin, Mark Reynolds, Morgan Roseborough, Wally Seigler, Laura Simic, Tom York

 

b.        Absent:  Dixie Airey, Kathi Baucom, Susan Brooks, Gary Caton, Randy Duncan, Frank Fleming, Jon Hawn, Bill Hill, Bill Hill, Larry Howell, Dane Hughes, Tom Lamb, , Norm Lefebvre, John Mack, Darin Spease, Gina Smith, Gary Stinnett, Doug Thomas

 

2.       Main topics / issues:

 

a.       Welcome:   We are officially entering hurricane season and it has been predicted to be another year of high activity.

 

b.      Presentation by School Messenger (Sabrina Gardner) A major issue to come out of the emergency on April 13-16 was the inability of the EOC to effectively communicate with the Campus students, faculty and staff.  We are looking into a notification system that will have mass coverage of the campus.  School Messenger can be activated from any touch tone phone or any web browser.  It has a site capability to send 5K-10K calls per minute.  Easy application/test module has report, voice mail ability, email, call groups, text to speech, and is easy to upload database information via Excel or Word.  Has the ability to call either up to 4 contact numbers (1x) or 1 primary number multiple times (15x).  In order to be effective in transition, there should be a standardization of database phone numbers. The system database can be populated from any common database or ASCI, comma delimited file.  Pricing ranges from $2.65 pp/yr (with unlimited calls) or .65˘ pp/5 calls  and a $100 per person access fee for the person(s) who will be doing the updates and/or maintenance.  Legal issues were addressed regarding offering an opt in/opt out option to students.  We will continue to look at other available options.

 

For further discussion:

1.       Can UNC Charlotte piggy back on Charlotte Mecklenburg School System’s notification system?  What do they use?

2.       Issues regarding power outage if we have hardware here on campus.

3.       Are there other institutions that have a similar system?  If so, what?

4.1.Chancellor wants an 800 # set up to accept calls that will have continual update of University status recorded.

5.1.Caller I.D.

6.1.Parental issues

6. 

c.       After Action Review of Power Outage, April 13-16.  Morgan provided an after action summary of the EOC and University response, with observations and recommendations.

 

(1)    Chancellor Dubois discussed in the Chancellor’s Cabinet meeting last week that he want the issues identified along with a recommended course of action, with an  agent identified, and a target date offor completion.  These will be presented to the Advisory Council on June 19th.

 

(2)    One of the issues brought up - Is Atkins the right location for the EOC?  Originally, Atkins was chosen because it has a wireless network and was in the center of campus.  We must now look to options that will sustain power and consider a location that provides us with a place with the ability to do what needs to get done vs. proximity. A future exercises can include their participation from remote locations (i.e., outside the EOC).

 

(3)    Decisions to open or close the University must be made earlier.

 

(4)    Some Ddepartment heads said that they received no notifications.  It appears that a delineation of responsibility must be established.  What was the responsiveness/responsibility of the Department vs. the responsibility of the University?  The only division currently using MissionMode is Business Affairs.

 

(5)    What went well -

·         Campus Police response to the incident.

·         Facilities Management personnel responding to the incident.

·         Food Services (which has a Day 1 requirement) continuing to provide feeding to students, faculty, and staff with only one dining facility on commercial power and one on auxiliary power.

·         Non-essential employees who remained on campus to help, even though the University was officially closed.

 

(6)    For improvement-

·         Communication – this is essential in any emergency.

·            Next of Kin notification -

oWho’s responsibility is it? What are the procedures?  Faculty/Staff Death or Injury vs. Student Death/Injury

o·          

·         Auxiliary Generators

o        Priority locations need to be established

o        Phil Jones held a meeting on May 30th to address the issue of emergency / standby power for critical facilities.

oChilled water source failed even though the HVAC worked

o·         Liaison with Incident Commander – Who was doing this?

·         Status Reporting (Public Relations) to the mediafrom departments up to the EOC.

·         The Morgan showed a prototype “Dashboard”.   is up and running.  This will provide a good source of current operational capability for decision making.  However, it will require input from departments and divisions to make it an effective tool.information and a place of general input.

·         Decision making.  Who ultimately has decision making abilitiesWe need to make decisions and announce them with sufficient lead time for people to respond appropriately.

·         EOC – Selection of specific location should be based on:

o            Location

o        Power

o        Equipment

o        Availability of support / services

·            Resident Student Option – water issues up on the high floors

·         This exercise emergency did not entail an actual loss of academic space.  However,  if we were not able to open onpower was not restored to the remaining buildings by  Monday, we would have been short by 200 classrooms.  We need to identify a more responsive means to identify and accommodate academic space needs, particularly near the end of a semester.

 

d.       Outdoor Warning System.  Morgan informed the committee that the Outdoor Warning System has been ordered and is expected to be installed by Facilities Managementarrive towards the end of June.  There will be some roof reinforcement that needs to take place on Atkins to support the structureequipment.  When installed, it will have a tone decibel of 70 decibels that will cover the central part of campus and will weaken to a 60 decibel tone as you get out towards the athletic fields and fringes of campus.  It will also have voice capability so an verbal announcement can be made.

 

e.a.Pandemic Flu Workshop, June 7.  Morgan reported that 7 representatives from UNC Charlotte will be attending the information session about Pandemic Influenza.  Information sessions for employees along with a poster campaign are suggested means to spread the word regarding preparation.  Also suggested was Char-Meck and city/county coordinating emergency plan efforts.  Morgan will participate in a county exercise in July.  An attachment was distributed that illustrates the a plan for Avian Flu Response by Carnegie Mellon University. to Phase 1-3.  Can expect a domino affect in the event of an emergency and can expect a 40% absentee rate before there is even a confirmed case on campus.

e.       More information will be available following the workshop (June 7) and the county exercise (July).

 

f.        Proposed date for the next meeting:  The next meeting of the committee is scheduled for 10:00 AM on Friday, July 20, 2006, in Room 208 Cone Center. .

 

3.  The meeting adjourned at 11:30 AM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Morgan Roseborough

Director, Business Continuity Planning

UNC Charlotte